Shambles can be found either working on new recipes in the kitchen, making decisions that will inevitably give him incredible amounts of anxiety, and generally being a walking contradiction of a person.
tl;dr: this study has nothing to offer the PGP readership
Okay, the “studies” I’ve been seeing around here are getting ridiculous. At a quick glance:
1. This was a meta-analysis, which is to say a study of a bunch of other studies. Not to say that aggregating and summarizing data from a bunch of other sources is bad (shouts to every single paper I wrote during undergrad) but not promising.
2. “Okay, JAMA isn’t the worst publication out there but… wait, this was published in Peds.” What do you know, the studies this data was mined from is based on youths aged from 6-19 (the mean age here was 14.5). Poor sleep at those ages is defined (in the study) as less than 10 or 9 hours, depending on age; I haven’t slept that long in one night for about 3 years so I’ll go out on a limb and say this data doesn’t exactly fit the washed up 20-something demographic of PGP. Hopefully, anyways- otherwise there have been some very awkward “sup?”s thrown around.
3. The good: 467 studies were identified to be looked at.
The bad: 20 studies were selected
The ugly: 2 (TWO) reviewers extracted data. For those not in the research world that probably translates to “I had 2 of my underpaid and overworked techs independently review this, which means they probably threw some graphs together the two nights before I asked for them while cursing me, my general principles, and my ancestors’ judgement in continuing their familial lines” in PI-speak
4. There was a significant association between access and use of media devices and poor sleep, but no mention as to type of device, sleep/wake hours, general levels of activity during the day, or any of the myriad of activities and behaviors that could affect quality of sleep (in children)
5. Neither the word “insomnia” nor “insomniac” were used in any portion of the study itself
6. This is a recap of an Elite Daily article of a study that is a recap of 20 studies that are a sample size of 467 studies. The only thing I’m willing to get from this is that a study was done at some point by someone.
Wool, cotton, blend, cashmere, plaid, solid, wide stripes, thin stripes, The White Stripes, subtle prints- gotta have that diverse collection. A scarf for every occasion/outfit.
I’m working on a grant now, the critical scientific mindset is a hard mindset to get out of.
boy if you don’t-
tl;dr: this study has nothing to offer the PGP readership
Okay, the “studies” I’ve been seeing around here are getting ridiculous. At a quick glance:
1. This was a meta-analysis, which is to say a study of a bunch of other studies. Not to say that aggregating and summarizing data from a bunch of other sources is bad (shouts to every single paper I wrote during undergrad) but not promising.
2. “Okay, JAMA isn’t the worst publication out there but… wait, this was published in Peds.” What do you know, the studies this data was mined from is based on youths aged from 6-19 (the mean age here was 14.5). Poor sleep at those ages is defined (in the study) as less than 10 or 9 hours, depending on age; I haven’t slept that long in one night for about 3 years so I’ll go out on a limb and say this data doesn’t exactly fit the washed up 20-something demographic of PGP. Hopefully, anyways- otherwise there have been some very awkward “sup?”s thrown around.
3. The good: 467 studies were identified to be looked at.
The bad: 20 studies were selected
The ugly: 2 (TWO) reviewers extracted data. For those not in the research world that probably translates to “I had 2 of my underpaid and overworked techs independently review this, which means they probably threw some graphs together the two nights before I asked for them while cursing me, my general principles, and my ancestors’ judgement in continuing their familial lines” in PI-speak
4. There was a significant association between access and use of media devices and poor sleep, but no mention as to type of device, sleep/wake hours, general levels of activity during the day, or any of the myriad of activities and behaviors that could affect quality of sleep (in children)
5. Neither the word “insomnia” nor “insomniac” were used in any portion of the study itself
6. This is a recap of an Elite Daily article of a study that is a recap of 20 studies that are a sample size of 467 studies. The only thing I’m willing to get from this is that a study was done at some point by someone.
Wool, cotton, blend, cashmere, plaid, solid, wide stripes, thin stripes, The White Stripes, subtle prints- gotta have that diverse collection. A scarf for every occasion/outfit.
Exception approved on a conditional basis pending further review. Question one: sup?
Always. The gender ratio makes it tough in these SF streets tho
Listened to the new Bublé album yet? Feel like you’d appreciate it Will, v good
The subreddit idea seems good but I’m not tryna get Ken Bone’d
This elicited the slightest of pulls in my cold and still soul. You made me feel. Bravo.
You are a monster
Might be my inner (outer) minority speaking but uh, hard pass
You spelled “Will” wrong
Bouncing from house party to house party was the highlight of my last Halloween I think.
Hoooo boy, that man had a family
Went to school with Spiegel, if anything this isn’t douchey enough
I laughed, I cried, I immediately fled to my profile and sweat over my own bio instead of getting ready for work.
I need to pad my stats then. It’s times like this that I miss Duda.
Man I’m turning 26 and this has me sweating, I know it’s Monday but damn
Don’t forget USC
Not having anyone to force you into a dumb couple’s costume. PGP