Like I said, I appreciate your effort. I’m not demeaning you, I love what you’re doing. I’m looking out for the guys who have fishing pics, because without context you’re not helping them. And yes, I do think the celebrity comparisons matter because if I’m going to make an investment in a relationship and take on the risk and liability of a marriage I want her to look at me like I’m Tom Brady. Just like I want to look at my wife like she’s gisele (even if that’s unrealistic).
I appreciate your effort and your wit. However, there is zero context from a male perspective. Give me more reasons to care about your opinion other than you being female. I understand where you’re coming from, but from a male perspective you portray men in a poor fashion and come across as demeaning.
You’re trying to help guys, but in reality you’re listing circumstantial situations. For example: If Tom Brady were single and on bumble and had a fishing and gym selfie and didn’t list his height you would swipe right. Same for Jordan spieth, Jared Goff, Bryce Harper, Leo, ect. You’re listing circumstantial criteria you don’t apply to everyone and leave out the important context. If you want to provide actual dating advice for men, provide context and not just your opinion.
You should treat people well because it’s the right thing to do, not because you have expectations of them returning said behavior. If that’s why you act a certain way, you are that same shitty teenager, only more entitled and with higher expectations.
If you approach relationships from the perspective that everything in life should be an addition to your own happiness you will never be let down. It was always an addition to your already happy self. You deserve nothing and earn everything.
Crazy idea, if you can’t afford to be a bridesmaid be upfront and honest with your friend about the cost. If she is adamant about it and doesn’t understand she’s probably not your “bestie.”
“Why should someone choose to be with you if you aren’t the best version of yourself?” I find this comment/question to be very interesting. It leads me to a natural question, why do human beings get married?
How can you guarantee your partner will constantly be the best version of themselves? And how can you guarantee you will consistently be attracted (ideally most attracted) to the constant growth and change that comes with consistently being the best version of oneself? The best version of a person is an adaptation, and ultimately enlightenment, to the world around them, their relationships and their experiences.
So if you’re theory is based off of a “best version” why would a rational human being take on the liability of marriage in today’s day and age?
Advertise
Lol you’re really living up to yours. Just trying to help ya out man
Like I said, I appreciate your effort. I’m not demeaning you, I love what you’re doing. I’m looking out for the guys who have fishing pics, because without context you’re not helping them. And yes, I do think the celebrity comparisons matter because if I’m going to make an investment in a relationship and take on the risk and liability of a marriage I want her to look at me like I’m Tom Brady. Just like I want to look at my wife like she’s gisele (even if that’s unrealistic).
I appreciate your effort and your wit. However, there is zero context from a male perspective. Give me more reasons to care about your opinion other than you being female. I understand where you’re coming from, but from a male perspective you portray men in a poor fashion and come across as demeaning.
You’re trying to help guys, but in reality you’re listing circumstantial situations. For example: If Tom Brady were single and on bumble and had a fishing and gym selfie and didn’t list his height you would swipe right. Same for Jordan spieth, Jared Goff, Bryce Harper, Leo, ect. You’re listing circumstantial criteria you don’t apply to everyone and leave out the important context. If you want to provide actual dating advice for men, provide context and not just your opinion.
No one cares about your crappy dating life. And you don’t deserve shit, you earn it.
You should treat people well because it’s the right thing to do, not because you have expectations of them returning said behavior. If that’s why you act a certain way, you are that same shitty teenager, only more entitled and with higher expectations.
If you approach relationships from the perspective that everything in life should be an addition to your own happiness you will never be let down. It was always an addition to your already happy self. You deserve nothing and earn everything.
Crazy idea, if you can’t afford to be a bridesmaid be upfront and honest with your friend about the cost. If she is adamant about it and doesn’t understand she’s probably not your “bestie.”
“Why should someone choose to be with you if you aren’t the best version of yourself?” I find this comment/question to be very interesting. It leads me to a natural question, why do human beings get married?
How can you guarantee your partner will constantly be the best version of themselves? And how can you guarantee you will consistently be attracted (ideally most attracted) to the constant growth and change that comes with consistently being the best version of oneself? The best version of a person is an adaptation, and ultimately enlightenment, to the world around them, their relationships and their experiences.
So if you’re theory is based off of a “best version” why would a rational human being take on the liability of marriage in today’s day and age?