======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ===== ==== ====== ====== ===== ==== ======= ======= ====== ====== ====== ===== ==== ====== ====== ===== ====
Bradley Moss and Amy Bzura were engaged to be married last month. But for reasons unknown to the general public, the wedding never happened and both are now living separate lives. Sure, this is unfortunate for many reasons, but the nightmare of having to cancel your wedding is nothing compared to the legal battle these two have now engaged in over the $125,000 ring that Bradley gave to Amy.
Say what you want about buying a $125,000 ring. Me? I’ll say that it’s a dumb move because investing that much money into a literal piece of rock that’s solely there to be gushed at over lunch is just plain foolish. But as someone who doesn’t possess even half of that sum of money, there’s no saying how reckless I’d be with a bank account that’s dripping in commas.
The lawsuit, though, sounds like it might get a little messy.
Per The New York Post:
A week before the nuptials were scheduled, Bzura beamed on social media that she could not wait to be Mrs. Moss. She also posted to her Instagram: “I can’t wait to be your nagging and annoying Jewish wife. You mean everything to me and I can’t wait to say ‘I do’ and make you the happiest man in 2016!”
But for reasons not explained in the suit, “the marriage did not occur.”
On Nov. 3, Moss wrote Bzura a letter demanding she return the rock. But she “has willfully and maliciously refused,” the suit says.
The suit calls for the return of the ring, or its value in cash, with interest, along with punitive damages determined by the court.
With the little information we do know about this case, you have to bet that both are going to go down swinging but for very different reasons. Him? He probably has some buyer’s remorse and wants to return that thing so he can buy a Chris-Craft. Her? Well, imagine being given something worth $125,000 only to be asked for it back. She could probably break that stone in two and make some pretty lavish earrings, or just continue wearing it on your hand to put out luxurious vibes.
Either way, I think we can all agree that the biggest mistake here was spending that much money on the ring in the first place. Poor sap. .
Respond
Will
Will (Twitter / Instagram) is the host of The Sunday Scaries Podcast.
@willdefries
@willdefries
defriewf
will@grandex.co
If you’re going to drop an ungoldy amount of cash on a woman for something that will never happen, at least do it in the goddamn Champagne Room.
This was a good comment.
You’re a problem solver.
“a bank account that’s dripping in commas” PGG – Post Grad Goals
Fuck I’d settle for just one that doesn’t disappear after paying a bill or two
This has gotta catch on
NY state law says that an engagement ring is part of a conditional contract. He’ll get the ring back, and she’ll have lost both the ring and her attorney fees.
yeah he’s lucky they’re in New York, not every state has this provision
But what if they called it off because he’s already married?
He should have never bought the ring in the first place and got himself a nice Yellowfin to go fishing in
The thought of her breaking up the center stone to make earrings sent shivers up my spine. Blasphemy.
Nice casual brag that you have almost $125,000/2 in the bank
Really couldn’t do the math, could you?
I really couldn’t. And I didn’t want to embarrass myself more by posting a wrong answer.