No, that person’s right, you’re not advocating for smart, successful women. You’re saying again and again that “hot girls” are the only acceptable ones, but they still have to earn a ring with further notes and addenda. Don’t just be smart because it means they’re active and fulfilled, be smart to accessorize their roles as arm candy. How do you not see that? I can tell your intentions were better but the chauvinistic language got in the way. I’m an MBA with a lovely marriage of six years, and I think your shitty article explains why you’re still “dreaming of writing for a living.”
You don’t have to respond, I’m not giving you any more clicks.
Advertise
No, that person’s right, you’re not advocating for smart, successful women. You’re saying again and again that “hot girls” are the only acceptable ones, but they still have to earn a ring with further notes and addenda. Don’t just be smart because it means they’re active and fulfilled, be smart to accessorize their roles as arm candy. How do you not see that? I can tell your intentions were better but the chauvinistic language got in the way. I’m an MBA with a lovely marriage of six years, and I think your shitty article explains why you’re still “dreaming of writing for a living.”
You don’t have to respond, I’m not giving you any more clicks.