Yeah, let’s talk about the style of language used here. Starting with calling women “girls”. That’s super scholarly of you.
“Obviously I’m going to date someone I’m attracted to” == “Obviously, you still need to be hot”. Very well placed sentence up at the top of the article, lest we forget that women should obviously be good-looking. That’s important.
Actually, let’s back up… starting with the title. And the whole premise of this article and talking about successful women as being “beneficial” wives is male-centric. Be smart and hot so you make a good wife and make me look good is what I am reading here.
God, everything about the way this is written, “There are always girls who you can show off at events and dinners”… yeah brah! But at some point you can’t put up with the “dumb” ones, you need a woman that can throw events so your (straight male, obviously) boss comes over with *his* “arm candy”. That’s really all women are to you, huh?
Talking about womens’ brains as a commodity vs their looks is still talking about women AS COMMODITIES and from reading this I’m pretty convinced you don’t know what intelligence means.
TBH this is one of the worst articles I’ve read all week. No, you don’t get a gold star for trying either.
Advertise
Yeah, let’s talk about the style of language used here. Starting with calling women “girls”. That’s super scholarly of you.
“Obviously I’m going to date someone I’m attracted to” == “Obviously, you still need to be hot”. Very well placed sentence up at the top of the article, lest we forget that women should obviously be good-looking. That’s important.
Actually, let’s back up… starting with the title. And the whole premise of this article and talking about successful women as being “beneficial” wives is male-centric. Be smart and hot so you make a good wife and make me look good is what I am reading here.
God, everything about the way this is written, “There are always girls who you can show off at events and dinners”… yeah brah! But at some point you can’t put up with the “dumb” ones, you need a woman that can throw events so your (straight male, obviously) boss comes over with *his* “arm candy”. That’s really all women are to you, huh?
Talking about womens’ brains as a commodity vs their looks is still talking about women AS COMMODITIES and from reading this I’m pretty convinced you don’t know what intelligence means.
TBH this is one of the worst articles I’ve read all week. No, you don’t get a gold star for trying either.